# Asana AI AI layer inside the Asana work management platform. Includes AI Studio (no-code workflow and agent builder), smart status reports, smart fields, smart summaries, and chat over Asana data. ## About Asana AI Asana AI is the bundle of AI capabilities sitting inside Asana, the project and work management platform Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein founded in 2008. It includes AI Studio for building no-code workflows with embedded agents, plus smart summaries, smart fields, smart status, and a chat assistant that answers questions about Asana data. The pitch is simple: keep your projects in Asana, let AI take the busywork. Sistava is a different product category. Instead of adding AI to a project tool, Sistava hires a finished AI Employee that does the work itself. The employee owns a role (sales, marketing, support, ops), runs on its own schedule, and uses whatever tools the job needs. Asana AI helps inside Asana. Sistava does the job across Asana, Slack, Gmail, the browser, and any other surface. ## Platform details - Pricing: AI included on Starter ($10.99/user/mo annual) and Advanced ($24.99/user/mo annual). AI Studio Plus add-on around $150/mo with 100K credits. Pro tier sales-led with 5M credits per quarter. Free Personal plan up to 2 users with no AI Studio. - Founded: 2008, San Francisco - Funding: Approx $453M raised pre-IPO from Generation Investment Management, Founders Fund, Andreessen Horowitz. Public on NYSE since September 2020 (ticker ASAN). - Last reviewed: 2026-05-31 ## Official website - [Visit Asana AI](https://asana.com) ## What does Asana AI actually do? Asana AI is the AI layer Asana ships on top of its work management platform. The headline pieces are AI Studio (a no-code builder for workflows with embedded AI agents), smart status reports that draft updates from project activity, smart summaries on long threads, smart fields that auto-fill structured data, and a chat interface that answers questions about projects in your workspace. It is best understood as Asana made smarter, not as a standalone AI worker. AI Studio is the main attraction. You design a workflow in plain language, drop in AI steps that triage tickets, draft updates, or route requests, and publish the result inside Asana projects. Customers use it for intake triage, RFP responses, content review, and creative briefs. The runtime stays inside Asana and consumes credits per AI step. Sistava starts somewhere else. The unit is not a workflow but an AI Employee with a role and a schedule. The employee owns an outcome (close a deal, ship a campaign, answer support) and uses whatever tools fit, including Asana when relevant. Asana AI helps Asana users. Sistava helps founders who want the job done across every tool. ## How much does Asana AI actually cost? The list price looks gentle until you read the fine print. Personal is free for up to 2 users with no AI Studio. Starter is $10.99 per user per month on annual billing and includes 50,000 AI Studio credits per month. Advanced is $24.99 per user per month on annual billing with more credits. AI Studio Plus is sold as a roughly $150 per month add-on with 100,000 credits, and Pro is a sales-led tier with 5 million credits per quarter. Credits are the hidden axis. They are derived from token volume on the underlying model, so a chatty workflow on a frontier model burns faster than a simple summarizer. When credits run out, the smart layer simply goes dark until the next reset or a top-up. For a small team that lights up AI Studio across many projects, the credit bill can quietly overtake the seat bill. Sistava commits to one flat number that includes compute and model calls. There is no credit cliff that pauses your work mid-month. For a solo founder budgeting 12 months out, predictable beats elastic. ## When does Asana AI beat alternatives? Asana AI wins when Asana is already the operating system of the company. Mid-market teams that run every initiative, OKR, and project inside Asana get real lift from smart status, smart summaries, and AI Studio workflows that triage intake and route work. Adding Sistava on top of that stack would be redundant if the goal is only to make Asana projects easier to run. It also wins on integration depth inside its own ecosystem. AI Studio can read fields, custom rules, portfolios, goals, and project history that Asana already holds, which means less plumbing for a team that lives there. Sistava covers more surfaces but trades that depth for breadth. Finally, Asana AI is a safer bet for compliance-heavy enterprises that already approved Asana as a vendor. Adding an internal AI layer is usually faster than introducing a new vendor for AI work, even if the new vendor would do more. ## Where does Asana AI fall short for solo founders? Solo founders rarely need a smarter project tool. They need work to actually happen: outbound sent, posts written, tickets answered, leads researched, follow-ups scheduled. Asana AI assumes a team is already there to plan, assign, and review. Without that team, AI Studio is a workflow editor with no one to feed it. Per-seat plus credit pricing is the second problem. The Starter tier looks affordable until you add AI Studio Plus and discover credits are the real meter. For a one-person company that wants AI to do the bulk of the work, the credit ceiling is exactly where Asana AI starts charging more. Cross-tool execution is the third gap. Sistava's employees write emails, push to CRMs, run browser tasks, and call third-party APIs as part of their daily routine. Asana AI is strongest inside Asana and weaker the moment work needs to leave the platform. Honest take: Asana AI is excellent at making Asana smarter. It is not a replacement for a coworker who owns an outcome end to end. ## How does Asana AI handle cross-tool work? Asana AI relies on Asana's integration catalog for cross-tool work. Connectors into Slack, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, Jira, GitHub, and Google Workspace move data in and out of Asana, and AI Studio steps can call out to those connectors during a workflow. The model is hub and spoke with Asana at the center. Sistava treats every tool as equal terrain. The employee logs into Gmail to send outbound, opens a browser to research a prospect, posts to Slack, writes to a CRM, and updates a doc, all in one run. Work does not need to flow through a central project board to count. For a team whose work mostly lives inside Asana, the hub model is fine. For a founder whose work jumps between five tools an hour, a cross-tool worker is more useful than a central hub that only knows one of them well. ## Comparison - [Compare Asana AI with Sistava](/en/compare/pm-ai/asana-ai) — See the two platforms side by side when you are ready to evaluate them.