# Sistava vs Gamma

*AI Marketing and Content*

Gamma vs Sistava

Gamma turns a prompt into a finished presentation, document or website, with design handled for you. It has grown to more than 50 million users and roughly $100M ARR on a $2.1B valuation, largely by being the fastest way to get from an idea to something presentable. Sistava does not compete on generation quality. It competes on who decides what to generate: a marketing employee that owns a content calendar, produces against it on a schedule, and reports what performed.

> **Bottom line:** Sistava employees decide what to produce from a strategy and a schedule. Gamma produces what a human asks for, when they ask.

## Profile

- **Pricing:** Free tier with a starting AI credit allowance. Paid Plus and Pro tiers sit roughly in the $10 to $20 per month range billed annually, with Business and Enterprise above. Credits are consumed per generation.
- **Founded:** 2020, San Francisco, by Grant Lee, James Fox, Jamie Horsnell and Jon Noronha
- **Funding:** $87M raised over 3 rounds (Accel, Andreessen Horowitz). Valued at $2.1B with around $100M ARR and 50M+ users
- **Focus:** AI generation of presentations, documents and websites from a prompt

## Why Sistava

- Sistava employees decide what to produce from a strategy and a schedule. Gamma produces what a human asks for, when they ask.
- Sistava carries layered memory of your brand, past campaigns and what performed, so the next asset builds on the last. Gamma works per document with the context in that prompt.
- Sistava publishes and distributes across connected channels and reports on results. Gamma outputs a deck, doc or site for you to take elsewhere.
- Sistava covers the rest of the function too: SEO research, social scheduling, email campaigns, analytics. Gamma is focused on generation and presentation.
- Sistava runs unattended on a schedule with work journals showing what shipped. Gamma is an interactive tool that waits for you.

## Feature Comparison

| Feature | Gamma | Sistava |
|---|---|---|
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | Category-leading | Via content tools |
|  | Excellent, the core product | Good |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | Schedules, duties, heartbeat |
|  | Share links and export | ✓ |
|  | Per-document context | Layered short-term, long-term, graph |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | Limited, export focused | Thousands of native + MCP |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | View analytics per deck | ✓ |
|  | Free tier, paid roughly $10-$20/mo annual | Free (2,000 lifetime credits) + $49/mo |