# Sista AI vs Relevance AI

*AI Workforces*

Sistava vs Relevance AI

Relevance AI is our closest competitor, positioning as an "AI Workforce" platform with a low-code builder for creating AI agents. They primarily target sales and GTM teams with 1,000+ integrations and enterprise logos like Canva and KPMG. Sistava differentiates with pre-built teams that work out of the box, team hierarchy with leader delegation, and a conversation-first experience instead of a visual builder.

## Profile

- **Pricing:** Free, then $19/mo (Pro) or custom (Enterprise). Credits-based.
- **Founded:** 2020, Sydney
- **Funding:** $24M Series B (Bessemer Venture Partners)
- **Focus:** No-code AI workforce builder for sales and GTM teams

## Why Sista AI

Sistava ships pre-built teams with a leader who delegates to specialists. Relevance AI requires you to build each agent from scratch or adapt a template.,Onboarding in Sistava is conversational. You talk to your employee to set them up. Relevance uses a visual builder that requires understanding agent design.,Sistava includes sprint planning, standups, retros, and work journals, treating AI employees like real staff. Relevance focuses on individual task execution.,Sistava layers short-term, long-term, episodic, and graph memory across the workforce, so an employee remembers what happened on a call three weeks ago without re-explaining. Relevance offers per-agent knowledge bases that reset between sessions.,Sistava supports MCP for custom tool connections. Relevance relies on its own connector library plus Zapier.

## Feature Comparison

| Feature | Relevance AI | Sista AI |
|---|---|---|
|  | ✓ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | Sales + GTM focus | Sales, Marketing, Support, Ops |
|  | 1,000+ native + Zapier | Thousands of native + MCP |
|  | Per-agent knowledge base | Layered short-term, long-term, graph |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | ✗ | ✓ |
|  | Free + $19/mo | Free + $79/mo |