Sistava vs Cyndra
AI Workforces
Cyndra vs Sistava
Cyndra positions as Enterprise AI Agents, Deployed and Operated. It pairs an agent platform with a dedicated team that handles discovery, integration, deployment and ongoing operations, aimed at professional services, financial services, private equity and real estate. Its self-serve offering is branded an AI workforce platform and its navigation references AI employees, so it competes on our keywords while selling a very different engagement. Sistava is the self-serve, founder-priced version of that promise.
Profile
- Pricing
- Platform pricing is referenced but not published on the homepage. Enterprise motion combining platform access with a dedicated deployment team.
- Founded
- Not publicly disclosed
- Funding
- Not publicly disclosed
- Focus
- Enterprise AI agents deployed and operated by an accountable vendor team
Why Sistava
- Sistava is self-serve with published pricing. Cyndra runs an enterprise motion where platform access comes bundled with a deployment engagement.
- Sistava gives you a marketplace of pre-built roles you can hire in minutes. Cyndra scopes and builds agents around your specific workflows.
- Sistava adds a leader, a shared board and sprints that close with a written review, so the workforce manages itself. Cyndra provides an accountable human team instead.
- Sistava exposes work journals and an execution inspector directly to you. Cyndra keeps operations with its own team.
- Sistava supports custom MCP servers, A2A agents, browser and desktop control out of the box. Cyndra integrates per engagement into your systems.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cyndra | Sistava |
|---|---|---|
| ✓ | ✓ | |
| Scoped and built per client | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| Human deployment team | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✓ | Approval gates per tool | |
| Integrated per engagement | Thousands of native + MCP | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| Not published | Free (2,000 lifetime credits) + $49/mo |