Sistava vs Relevance AI
AI Workforces
Sistava vs Relevance AI
Relevance AI is our closest competitor, positioning as an "AI Workforce" platform with a low-code builder for creating AI agents. They primarily target sales and GTM teams with 1,000+ integrations and enterprise logos like Canva and KPMG. Sistava differentiates with pre-built teams that work out of the box, team hierarchy with leader delegation, and a conversation-first experience instead of a visual builder.
Profile
- Pricing
- Free, then $19/mo (Pro) or custom (Enterprise). Credits-based.
- Founded
- 2020, Sydney
- Funding
- $24M Series B (Bessemer Venture Partners)
- Focus
- No-code AI workforce builder for sales and GTM teams
Why Sistava
- Sistava ships pre-built teams with a leader who delegates to specialists. Relevance AI requires you to build each agent from scratch or adapt a template.
- Onboarding in Sistava is conversational. You talk to your employee to set them up. Relevance uses a visual builder that requires understanding agent design.
- Sistava includes sprint planning, standups, retros, and work journals, treating AI employees like real staff. Relevance focuses on individual task execution.
- Sistava layers short-term, long-term, episodic, and graph memory across the workforce, so an employee remembers what happened on a call three weeks ago without re-explaining. Relevance offers per-agent knowledge bases that reset between sessions.
- Sistava supports MCP for custom tool connections. Relevance relies on its own connector library plus Zapier.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Relevance AI | Sistava |
|---|---|---|
| ✓ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| Sales + GTM focus | Sales, Marketing, Support, Ops | |
| 1,000+ native + Zapier | Thousands of native + MCP | |
| Per-agent knowledge base | Layered short-term, long-term, graph | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| ✗ | ✓ | |
| Free + $19/mo | Free + $49/mo |