Legal team reviews AI-drafted contracts before send
The AI employee drafts the contract and pauses, sending it to legal for approval before it goes to the client. Nothing leaves without a human sign-off.
Your employee pauses and asks before acting on anything sensitive, so you stay in control without slowing down routine work.
Your employee pauses before any sensitive action, explains what it wants to do and why, and waits for your explicit approval. It might say: "I want to send this email to 50 leads. Here is the draft. Approve or reject?" You read it, approve with one click, and it proceeds. If something looks wrong, you reject and give feedback. Nothing sensitive happens without your say-so.
The approval gateway is smart about what needs approval and what does not. Routine tasks like writing a document draft, searching the web, or updating a task board happen automatically. High-stakes actions like sending emails to customers, posting on social media, making purchases, or modifying production systems trigger an approval request. You configure where the line sits per employee.
Approval requests reach you through in-app notifications and email. Approve or reject from either channel without switching context. If you are away and an approval sits pending for too long, the employee waits. It does not default to "go ahead." Your AI workforce respects the boundary between autonomy and oversight.
Not every action an AI agent takes should happen automatically. The Approval Gateway lets you define exactly which actions, tools, or conditions require a human sign-off before the agent proceeds. Whether it is sending an email to a client, deleting a file, or submitting a form, the employee pauses, explains what it is about to do and why, and waits for your approval.
This is not a blunt kill switch. The agent presents its reasoning in plain language so you understand the full context before deciding. You can approve, reject, or redirect, and the employee continues from that point without losing its place in the task. It is the difference between autonomous AI and trusted autonomous AI.
Every team has a different risk threshold. A marketing agent scheduling social posts may need no approval at all, while a finance agent initiating transfers should pause on every transaction above a certain amount. Approval Gateway lets you define those rules per employee, per tool, or per action type.
Rules can be based on tool category (external communications, financial actions, data deletion), output content, or custom conditions you define. Once set, the policy applies consistently, even as the agent handles dozens of concurrent tasks. You stay in control without being in the way.
Approval history is logged with full context: what the agent intended, who approved or rejected, and what happened next. This creates an auditable record useful for compliance, team review, and improving your configuration over time.
As organizations deploy more autonomous agents, the question of human oversight becomes critical. Research on agentic AI consistently identifies human-in-the-loop checkpoints as the most practical safety mechanism for high-stakes workflows. Approval Gateway is that mechanism, built directly into every AI employee.
Unlike bolt-on approval tools, this is native to the agent's decision loop. The agent is trained to recognize when it is entering sensitive territory and surface the decision to a human rather than proceeding on assumption. This makes your AI workforce predictable and trustworthy, especially in regulated industries or customer-facing roles.
The AI employee drafts the contract and pauses, sending it to legal for approval before it goes to the client. Nothing leaves without a human sign-off.
When the AI agent prepares a payment or invoice, it routes to the finance lead for approval before executing, preventing unauthorized transactions.
The AI employee queues content for review, the team approves or edits, and only then does the agent publish. The quality gate is always in place.
Any AI agent action that touches production systems or sensitive data triggers an approval request, so a human always authorizes critical steps.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| AI agents act on sensitive tasks with no human check. | The approval gateway stops the agent and waits for explicit sign-off. |
| Mistakes from autonomous AI actions are caught after the fact. | Approvals catch issues before the agent takes the action. |
| Building approval flows into AI workflows requires custom code. | Approval gates are a native platform feature, configured in minutes. |
| Compliance requires human sign-off but AI doesn't support it. | Every critical action can be gated behind an approval step. |
Any tool call, external communication, data write, or custom condition you define can be gated. You configure rules per employee or globally, down to specific tool types or action patterns. The agent evaluates these rules at runtime before executing.
You can set a timeout policy per rule: wait indefinitely, escalate to a team lead, or cancel the action with a logged reason. The agent does not proceed on its own if approval is required and not received.
Yes. Every approval request includes the agent's reasoning: what task it is working on, what it plans to do, and why this step requires sign-off. You always have enough context to make an informed decision.
Yes. In multi-agent orchestration scenarios, the requesting agent pauses and surfaces the approval to a human owner of that employee. The approval chain is tracked so you can see which agent in a workflow triggered the gate.
Yes, the approval gateway lets you designate specific actions that require a human sign-off before the agent proceeds. The agent pauses, sends you the request, and only continues after you approve or reject it.
We turned on approval gates for anything touching customer data. Now I can let agents run freely without worrying about compliance.