Public support agent never embarrasses the brand
Off-tone or unsafe replies are caught before a customer ever sees them.
Output Safety reads your employee's reply before anyone else does. Toxic, abusive, or otherwise unfit answers are held back rather than sent, which is what you want the moment employees write to customers, post to a channel, or answer a ticket without you watching. It checks the reply your employee actually wrote, so what you see caught is what would genuinely have gone out. Set it to Low, Medium, or High and review everything it held back in the live inspector. Blunt, direct, and critical business writing is left alone: the policy is looking for replies that would embarrass you, not ones that are simply frank.
Output Safety reviews every response your AI employee generates before it is delivered, on every channel from chat to email to Slack. Toxic content, unsafe instructions, and replies that drift from your brand's tone are caught and blocked, so nothing an employee produces reaches a customer, teammate, or channel without passing the check first.
The check runs on a separate, lightweight model built for a fast yes-or-no call, not the model that wrote the reply. It gets a 5-second window with one retry on a timeout, and its own token usage is metered and billed to your account like any other model call, on top of the credits the employee spends generating the response itself.
A blocked response is never rewritten or regenerated: the recipient sees a short policy message in its place, and the block is logged as a violation you can review. If the check itself cannot complete after two tries, it fails open rather than holding up the reply, the original response goes out unfiltered, and the outage is flagged internally so it gets fixed rather than silently tolerated. Output Safety also shares its scanning pass with Data Leakage Prevention: enable both and one check covers both, with Output Safety's sensitivity setting taking precedence.
Blunt is not the same thing as unsafe, and the policy is written to know the difference. A firm no, a one-line answer, a critical read of someone's draft: all of that passes untouched. What gets stopped is abuse, slurs, threats, instructions that could hurt someone, and replies so far from your voice that a reader would notice. An employee that hedges every sentence is less useful than one that speaks plainly, so the gate is deliberately not tuned to soften people.
The check runs exactly once per reply and it is the last thing that happens before delivery. That ordering is the whole point. It reads the words your employee actually wrote, in their final form, not a draft and not a summary of one. So what you see held back in the log is what would genuinely have reached the customer, which is what makes the log worth reading.
What you get back is permission to leave employees talking to people while you are somewhere else. Overnight support, weekend inbox coverage, outreach that runs during a meeting: all of it leaves through the same checkpoint, and message four thousand is read as carefully as message one. Coverage does not thin out when volume spikes, which is exactly the moment a manual spot check would start missing things.
Language models are probabilistic, and at sufficient volume, rare failures happen. Output Safety accepts that premise and adds a checkpoint after generation: each response is evaluated before delivery, and anything unsafe, toxic, or off-tone is stopped there.
The customer, the inbox, or the Slack channel only ever sees what passes. The failure that would have been a screenshot on social media becomes a logged event in your dashboard instead.
Safety here is not only about toxicity. A reply that is technically harmless but sarcastic, dismissive, or wildly off your voice damages trust in quieter ways. The output layer evaluates tone as well as content, keeping employees inside the personality you gave them.
This matters more as your workforce grows. Ten employees across five channels is a volume of communication no human reviews line by line. The output gate reviews all of it, every time, at machine speed.
A blocked response is not delivered as generated. The recipient sees a short policy message instead, the block is logged with the category and reason, and you can watch patterns across employees to tell whether something upstream, like a prompt, a skill, or a policy, needs attention.
Sensitivity is one company-wide setting per tenant, Low, Medium, or High, defaulting to Medium, and it applies to every employee on every channel the same way. There is no per-employee dial: loosen or tighten it from the Policies tab and the change takes effect immediately across the whole workforce.
Generated responses pass a safety and tone checkpoint before they reach anyone.
After the employee drafts a response and before it is delivered, the output layer evaluates it for toxicity, unsafe instructions, and drift from your brand voice. Clean responses, which is nearly all of them, go straight out with no perceptible delay.
Anything that fails is blocked rather than rewritten. The recipient sees a short policy message in place of the reply, and the block is recorded with its category and reason so you can open it later and see exactly what was stopped. Strictness is one company-wide setting, Low, Medium, or High, so every employee on every channel is held to the same line and you move that line in a single place.
If the check itself cannot finish, it fails open. After a short timeout and one retry the original reply is delivered unchecked rather than left sitting there, and the failure is flagged internally so it gets fixed instead of quietly tolerated. That is a deliberate trade: a customer waiting on an answer is a real cost, and the gate is not allowed to become the reason your workforce goes silent.
Off-tone or unsafe replies are caught before a customer ever sees them.
Across thousands of messages, every one is checked against your tone, not just the first few.
Unsafe claims are filtered before delivery, supporting compliance review.
A spike in blocks points to a prompt or policy that needs a fix before it spreads.
| Before | After |
|---|---|
| A bad AI reply becomes a public screenshot. | It becomes a blocked, logged event instead. |
| Tone drifts as you scale message volume. | Every message is checked against your voice. |
| Reviewing output by hand is impossible at scale. | The gate reviews all of it, every time. |
| You learn about failures from angry customers. | You see them in the dashboard before they ship. |
Yes. Output Safety evaluates every response before delivery on every channel, blocking toxic, unsafe, or off-tone content automatically.
No. It is a pass or block checkpoint, not an editor. A response that passes goes out untouched; a response that fails is replaced with a short policy message, and the original is never sent.
Yes. Blocked outputs are logged with the category and reason, giving you visibility into how often the gate fires and whether anything upstream needs adjusting.
It fails open. After a five-second timeout and one retry, an unchecked response is still delivered rather than held back, and the outage is flagged internally for us to fix. It is not silently swallowed.
The check itself runs on a separate model and that usage is metered and billed like any other model call, in addition to the credits the employee spends generating the reply.
No. Output Safety is tuned for abuse, unsafe instructions, and replies that would embarrass you, not for directness. A firm no, a one-line answer, or a critical read of someone's draft passes straight through, because an employee that hedges every sentence is worse at the job than one that speaks plainly.
Output Safety lives on the Policies tab of your company dashboard in Sistava. It is a single organization-wide switch with a sensitivity of Low, Medium, or High, defaulting to Medium, and the change applies to every employee on every channel as soon as you save it.
They catch different problems. Data Leakage Prevention looks for your own confidential material leaving in a reply, while Output Safety judges whether the reply itself is safe and on tone. Turn both on and they share one scanning pass, so the work is not done twice.
Block Unsafe Employee Responses is part of What stops them from going wrong.
Your AI agents pause before any sensitive action and wait for your approval. PII is detected and redacted before it reaches the model. Content policies block harmful or off-brand output. Execution limits prevent runaway tasks. A Sistava mentor pairs with every employee to spot blockers and keep work on track alongside their team leader. Set company-wide policies once and every employee follows them, including future hires.