Sistava

Compliance Review and Mapping

AI Legal Support

Find out what applies to you before someone else does

Compliance obligations arrive quietly. A new market, a new customer segment, a new data type, or simply passing a headcount threshold, and rules apply that did not before. Nobody sends a notification.,Marco maps what applies to your business given where you operate, what you sell, and whose data you touch. Then he maps it against what you actually have in place, so the output is a gap list rather than an abstract regulation summary.,This is the preparatory work, the reading, mapping, and evidence gathering that makes a compliance project tractable. Signing off that you are compliant remains a qualified human judgement.

Benefits

How It Works

  1. Step 1:
  2. Step 2:
  3. Step 3:
  4. Step 4:
  5. Step 5:

At a Glance

Yours
Obligations mapped to your profile
Gaps
Output shape, not a rule summary
Ranked
By exposure, not alphabetically
Re-run
When you enter a new market

The Expensive Way to Learn an Obligation Applies

Most businesses discover a compliance obligation in one of three ways, and all of them are worse than looking it up. A prospective enterprise customer sends a security questionnaire, and the deal stalls for six weeks while you assemble answers you do not have. A user exercises a right you did not know they had, and you have thirty days to respond to something nobody owns. Or a regulator writes. Each of those is the same failure, which is not knowing what applied, and each is far more expensive than the mapping exercise that would have surfaced it.

Thresholds Move Underneath You

Compliance questions are usually treated as one-time, answered at founding and rarely revisited. But almost every obligation is conditional on facts that change as the business grows: how many people you employ, how much you turn over, which countries your customers sit in, what categories of data you hold. A business that genuinely had no obligation at twelve months can have several at thirty, without anyone doing anything differently. Tying the re-check to those facts changing, rather than to an annual reminder nobody honours, is what keeps the map true.

A Gap List Beats a Regulation Summary

There is no shortage of accurate writing about what GDPR requires, and it does not help, because the hard part was never understanding the rule in the abstract. It is knowing which of its requirements you specifically fail right now, and what document or control would close each one. That means holding the obligation and your actual current state side by side, which requires knowing both. A summary of the law knows only half, which is why reading more of them never moves a project forward.

FAQ

Does this make us compliant?

No. It tells you what applies and where your gaps are, which is the part that usually blocks a compliance project from starting. Closing the gaps is work, and signing off that you are compliant is a judgement a qualified professional makes and stands behind. What this removes is the months of not knowing where to begin.

Which regimes does he cover?

The ones a growing business most commonly meets: data protection such as GDPR, UK GDPR and CCPA, consumer protection and distance selling rules, electronic marketing consent, and accessibility expectations for public interfaces. Heavily regulated sectors such as financial services, healthcare, or aviation need specialist advice and the map says so plainly rather than pretending otherwise.

How is this different from a compliance platform?

Most platforms start from a framework you have already chosen, such as SOC 2, and track evidence against its controls. This starts a step earlier, from what applies to you at all. The two work well together: this establishes which obligations are real for your business, then a platform tracks the evidence for the framework you decide to pursue.

What triggers a re-check?

Entering a new country, selling to a new customer type such as moving from business to consumer, handling a new category of data such as health or biometric, crossing a headcount or revenue threshold, and adding a processor in a new jurisdiction.